Clicky

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200

Portability
90
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front
Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs

Fujifilm Real 3D W3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
  • Announced August 2010
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Fujifilm S9200, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by FujiFilm. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was brought out 4 years prior to the Fujifilm S9200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going into a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades versus the Fujifilm S9200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Fujifilm S9200

 Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Fujifilm S9200 
Screen size3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1150k460kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3

 Fujifilm S9200 Fujifilm Real 3D W3 
RevealedJanuary 2014August 2010More modern by 41 months

Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Fujifilm S9200

 Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Fujifilm S9200 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 features outside dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Fujifilm S9200 has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Fujifilm S9200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 compared to the Fujifilm S9200.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Fujifilm S9200 is 90 and 61 respectively.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The image underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Fujifilm S9200.

As you can plainly see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Fujifilm S9200 to produce more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm S9200 as a Portrait photography camera
19
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
low MP (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
37
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm S9200 as a Street photography camera
45
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competition in class (230g)
41
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than others (670g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Sports photography features
Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography features
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
55
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
good battery (500 CIPA)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Travel photography highlights
Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography highlights
48
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (230g)
low MP (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
54
good battery (500 shots)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than others (670 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Landscape photography factors
Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography factors
26
screen larger than average (3.5")
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
44
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
good battery (500 per charge)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Vlogging details
Fujifilm S9200 Vlogging details
21
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic port
heavier than competition in class (230 grams)
26
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic socket
heavier than others (670 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Fujifilm S9200
 Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3Fujifilm FinePix S9200
General Information
Company FujiFilm FujiFilm
Model Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Fujifilm FinePix S9200
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-08-17 2014-01-06
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by 3D RP(Real Photo) HD -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus distance 8cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,150 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 97%
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/4s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1000s 1/1700s
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.60 m 7.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 230 gr (0.51 pounds) 670 gr (1.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 500 photographs
Battery type - AA
Battery model NP-50 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $900 $300