Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very close and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was announced 3 years before the TG-2 iHS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades versus the TG-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 610k | Clearer display (+540k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| TG-2 iHS | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 34 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has physical dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus the TG-2 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-2 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through technical specs. The image below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-2 iHS to render greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-08-17 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,150 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $900 | $380 |