Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-340
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was manufactured 17 months earlier than the VR-340 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up vs the VR-340 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus VR-340. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus VR-340
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| VR-340 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus VR-340
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 features outer dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus VR-340 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus the VR-340.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and VR-340 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and VR-340.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus VR-340 to render greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-08-17 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,150 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $900 | $130 |