Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung TL205
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is PL100
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Samsung TL205, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the TL205 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was brought out 8 months after the TL205 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up versus the TL205 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Samsung TL205. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Samsung TL205
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 8 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| TL205 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Samsung TL205
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 provides external dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung TL205 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Samsung TL205 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus the TL205.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TL205 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing specs. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TL205.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung TL205 to show greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Samsung TL205 |
| Other name | - | PL100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-17 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,150 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 177 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $900 | $180 |