Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Kodak M320
56 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Display
- ISO 320 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 820g - 148 x 125 x 80mm
- Launched August 2000
- Successor is Fujifilm S2 Pro
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Kodak M320 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Kodak M320, one being a Pro DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S1 Pro (3MP) and M320 (9MP) and the Fujifilm S1 Pro (APS-C) and M320 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm S1 Pro was released 9 years before the M320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S1 Pro being a Large SLR camera and the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm S1 Pro scores against the M320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Kodak M320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro and Kodak EasyShare M320. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S1 Pro Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S1 Pro over the Kodak M320
| Fujifilm S1 Pro | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Fujifilm S1 Pro
| M320 | Fujifilm S1 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2009 |  | August 2000 | Fresher by 102 months |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2" | Larger display (+0.7") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 200k | Sharper display (+30k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and Kodak M320
| Fujifilm S1 Pro | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S1 Pro features external measurements of 148mm x 125mm x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") having a weight of 820 grams (1.81 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Kodak M320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S1 Pro versus the M320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S1 Pro and M320 is 56 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and M320.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S1 Pro due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Kodak M320 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S1 Pro is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Class | Pro DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2000-08-08 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Large SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 23 x 15.5mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 356.5mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 3MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3040 x 2016 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 320 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Nikon F | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Available lenses | 309 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 200k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 15.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/125s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 820 grams (1.81 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 148 x 125 x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $2,000 | $39 |
