Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh CX3
56 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 320 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 820g - 148 x 125 x 80mm
- Launched August 2000
- Successor is Fujifilm S2 Pro
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh CX3, former being a Pro DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S1 Pro (3MP) and CX3 (10MP) and the Fujifilm S1 Pro (APS-C) and CX3 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S1 Pro was unveiled 10 years before the CX3 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S1 Pro being a Large SLR camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm S1 Pro grades against the CX3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro & Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S1 Pro Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S1 Pro over the Ricoh CX3
| Fujifilm S1 Pro | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Fujifilm S1 Pro
| CX3 | Fujifilm S1 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | August 2000 | Fresher by 119 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2" | Larger display (+1") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 200k | Clearer display (+720k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and Ricoh CX3
| Fujifilm S1 Pro | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S1 Pro has got external dimensions of 148mm x 125mm x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") having a weight of 820 grams (1.81 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S1 Pro and the CX3.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S1 Pro and CX3 is 56 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S1 Pro and CX3.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S1 Pro with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Ricoh CX3 will render greater detail having an extra 7MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S1 Pro will be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm S1 Pro vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2000-08-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23 x 15.5mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 356.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 3MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3040 x 2016 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 320 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Nikon F | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 309 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 200 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 90% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 15.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/125 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 820g (1.81 lbs) | 206g (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 148 x 125 x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $2,000 | $329 |