Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH1
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS10
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH1 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH1, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and FH1 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and FH1 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 II was revealed 5 years after the FH1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M5 II matches up vs the FH1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Panasonic FH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic FH1
E-M5 II | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | January 2010 | Newer by 62 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Olympus E-M5 II
FH1 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FH1
E-M5 II | FH1 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has got physical dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Panasonic FH1 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 II versus the FH1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and FH1 is 80 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and FH1.
As you can see, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M5 II will show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 II should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FS10 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lb) | 163 gr (0.36 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $699 | $150 |