Fujifilm S1 vs Samsung PL200
60 Imaging
40 Features
67 Overall
50
94 Imaging
36 Features
22 Overall
30
Fujifilm S1 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 680g - 133 x 91 x 110mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S1 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm S1 vs Samsung PL200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S1 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S1 was manufactured 3 years after the PL200 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm S1 scores vs the PL200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S1 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S1 and Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm S1 Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S1 over the Samsung PL200
| Fujifilm S1 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 | July 2010 | Newer by 43 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Fujifilm S1
| PL200 | Fujifilm S1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S1 and Samsung PL200
| Fujifilm S1 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S1 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S1 offers external measurements of 133mm x 91mm x 110mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.3") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S1 vs Samsung PL200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S1 versus the PL200.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S1 and PL200 is 60 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S1 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The image underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S1 and PL200.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Fujifilm S1 to result in greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S1 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S1 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm S1 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S1 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S1 | Samsung PL200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 680 grams (1.50 lbs) | 170 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 91 x 110mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.3") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-85 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $0 |