Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma SD9
56 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 850g - 142 x 131 x 80mm
- Announced August 2002
- Replaced the Fujifilm S1 Pro
- Later Model is Fujifilm S3 Pro
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- Updated by Sigma SD10
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma SD9, one being a Pro DSLR and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S2 Pro (6MP) and SD9 (3MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (APS-C).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm S2 Pro was manufactured 3 months before the SD9 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S2 Pro being a Large SLR camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm S2 Pro grades against the SD9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm S2 Pro Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2 Pro over the Sigma SD9
| Fujifilm S2 Pro | SD9 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Fujifilm S2 Pro
| SD9 | Fujifilm S2 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 130k | 117k | Clearer screen (+13k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2 Pro and Sigma SD9
| Fujifilm S2 Pro | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2002 | November 2002 | Same generation | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 1.8" | 1.8" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S2 Pro has got exterior measurements of 142mm x 131mm x 80mm (5.6" x 5.2" x 3.1") along with a weight of 850 grams (1.87 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma SD9 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S2 Pro versus the SD9.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S2 Pro and SD9 is 56 and 54 respectively.
Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S2 Pro and SD9.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Fujifilm S2 Pro to result in greater detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively.
Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm S2 Pro vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Sigma |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S2 Pro | Sigma SD9 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2002-08-02 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Large SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23 x 15.5mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 356.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 6MP | 3MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4256 x 2848 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Nikon F | Sigma SA |
| Total lenses | 309 | 76 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.8" | 1.8" |
| Resolution of screen | 117 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 92% | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 15.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/125 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 850 gr (1.87 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 131 x 80mm (5.6" x 5.2" x 3.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 2 or 100 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $2,000 | $3,001 |