Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z981
75 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Launched July 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z981 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm S2000HD versus Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and Z981 (14MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm S2000HD was brought out 17 months before the Z981 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm S2000HD matches up versus the Z981 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z981 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD & Kodak EasyShare Z981. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm S2000HD Gallery & Kodak Z981 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Kodak Z981
| Fujifilm S2000HD | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 201k | Crisper display (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Fujifilm S2000HD
| Z981 | Fujifilm S2000HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Kodak Z981
| Fujifilm S2000HD | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S2000HD features outer dimensions of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z981 has proportions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") and a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S2000HD versus Kodak Z981 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD vs the Z981.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S2000HD and Z981 is 75 and 66 respectively.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Z981.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Kodak Z981 to result in greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S2000HD will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm S2000HD vs Kodak Z981 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD | Kodak EasyShare Z981 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-414mm (14.8x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.80 m | 6.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lb) | 540 gr (1.19 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $280 | $299 |