Clicky

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10

Portability
75
Imaging
33
Features
22
Overall
28
Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD front
 
Sigma SD10 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs

Fujifilm S2000HD
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
  • 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
  • Released January 2009
Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800 (Raise to 1600)
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Released March 2004
  • Superseded the Sigma SD9
  • Successor is Sigma SD14
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm S2000HD and Sigma SD10, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the Fujifilm S2000HD (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm S2000HD was revealed 4 years after the SD10 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm S2000HD scores vs the SD10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Sigma SD10

 Fujifilm S2000HD SD10 
ReleasedJanuary 2009March 2004Newer by 59 months
Screen sizing2.7"1.8"Bigger screen (+0.9")
Screen resolution230k130kCrisper screen (+100k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Fujifilm S2000HD

 SD10 Fujifilm S2000HD 

Common features in the Fujifilm S2000HD and Sigma SD10

 Fujifilm S2000HD SD10 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S2000HD features outer measurements of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm S2000HD and Sigma SD10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S2000HD against the SD10.

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S2000HD and SD10 is 75 and 54 respectively.

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S2000HD and SD10.

As you can see, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm S2000HD with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Fujifilm S2000HD will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S2000HD should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm S2000HD
Portrait photography with Sigma SD10
27
focusing manually
can't use external flash
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
47
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
low megapixels (3 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S2000HD Street photography highlights
Sigma SD10 Street photography highlights
38
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
43
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competitors in class (950 grams)
max ISO too low (800)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S2000HD as a Sports photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Sports photography camera
23
great zoom range (28-414mm 14.8 x zoom)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
36
great max shutter speed (1/6,000 seconds)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (3 megapixels)
has no phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S2000HD Travel photography details
Sigma SD10 Travel photography details
53
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great zoom (414mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
29
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (950g)
low megapixels (3 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S2000HD as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Landscape photography camera
30
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
41
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (1.8 inch)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (3MP)
max ISO too low (800)
no Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S2000HD Vlogging info
Sigma SD10 Vlogging info
21
fairly wide (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone port
9
can't shoot video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm S2000HD vs Sigma SD10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S2000HD and Sigma SD10
 Fujifilm FinePix S2000HDSigma SD10
General Information
Make FujiFilm Sigma
Model Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD Sigma SD10
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Released 2009-01-15 2004-03-19
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 3MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 2268 x 1512
Highest native ISO 6400 800
Highest enhanced ISO - 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 28-414mm (14.8x) -
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.4 -
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Amount of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 1.8 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 130k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1000 seconds 1/6000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.80 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426g (0.94 lbs) 950g (2.09 lbs)
Dimensions 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash Type I or II
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $280 $198