Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung HZ10W
54 Imaging
44 Features
43 Overall
43
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 930g - 148 x 135 x 80mm
- Introduced March 2005
- Previous Model is Fujifilm S2 Pro
- Newer Model is Fujifilm S5 Pro
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is WB500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung HZ10W, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S3 Pro (6MP) and HZ10W (10MP) and the Fujifilm S3 Pro (APS-C) and HZ10W (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm S3 Pro was revealed 5 years earlier than the HZ10W and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S3 Pro being a Large SLR camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm S3 Pro matches up against the HZ10W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro & Samsung HZ10W. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm S3 Pro Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S3 Pro over the Samsung HZ10W
| Fujifilm S3 Pro | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 235k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+5k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Fujifilm S3 Pro
| HZ10W | Fujifilm S3 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2009 |  | March 2005 | More recent by 50 months |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Common features in the Fujifilm S3 Pro and Samsung HZ10W
| Fujifilm S3 Pro | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm S3 Pro comes with exterior measurements of 148mm x 135mm x 80mm (5.8" x 5.3" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 930 grams (2.05 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ10W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S3 Pro versus the HZ10W.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S3 Pro and HZ10W is 54 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S3 Pro and HZ10W.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm S3 Pro having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung HZ10W will show more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S3 Pro will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm S3 Pro vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro | Samsung HZ10W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB500 |
| Type | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2005-03-16 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23 x 15.5mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 356.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 6 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4256 x 2848 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Nikon F | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 309 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 235 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 94% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 15.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 930 gr (2.05 lb) | 249 gr (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 148 x 135 x 80mm (5.8" x 5.3" x 3.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 60 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 346 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 2 or 100 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Compact Flash Type I or II | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $300 |
