Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99936/999365ad02082c373d77125b0e75e9cdab1259d0" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S4200 front Fujifilm FinePix S4200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d49/88d491f346db87b2f72053243d7a55b3e85bdf50" alt="Olympus SH-50 front Olympus SH-50 front"
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Fujifilm S4200 and Olympus SH-50, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm S4200 (14MP) and the SH-50 (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The Fujifilm S4200 was announced 12 months before the SH-50 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S4200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm S4200 matches up against the SH-50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S4200 and Olympus SH-50. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm S4200 Gallery and Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4200 over the Olympus SH-50
Fujifilm S4200 | SH-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Fujifilm S4200
SH-50 | Fujifilm S4200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 12 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4200 and Olympus SH-50
Fujifilm S4200 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm S4200 provides physical dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has specifications of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S4200 and Olympus SH-50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S4200 against the SH-50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f973b/f973bd92a9e590715783cebc77f299d753f96d24" alt="Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S4200 and SH-50 is 67 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d29e6/d29e6b2a3e70fefec9adb82e328bb5dc1b4369e7" alt="Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The visual underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S4200 and SH-50.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus SH-50 to render extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S4200 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9289e/9289ea97351ca2bbbe2d7bb609b07a6438475d72" alt="Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3539f/3539fe2cd33fb959be5e65a4694b5c4575bfe01b" alt="Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm S4200 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Olympus SH-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Olympus SH-50 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 15 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 543g (1.20 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery format | AA | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $200 | $300 |