Fujifilm S4200 vs Panasonic ZS35
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37


89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Fujifilm S4200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40

Fujifilm S4200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Fujifilm S4200 vs Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S4200 (14MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is relatively similar and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The Fujifilm S4200 was introduced 24 months prior to the ZS35 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S4200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm S4200 matches up vs the ZS35 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm S4200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S4200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S4200 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4200 over the Panasonic ZS35
Fujifilm S4200 | ZS35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Fujifilm S4200
ZS35 | Fujifilm S4200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 24 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4200 and Panasonic ZS35
Fujifilm S4200 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm S4200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S4200 provides outside dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") along with a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S4200 vs Panasonic ZS35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm S4200 and the ZS35.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4200 and ZS35 is 67 and 89 respectively.

Fujifilm S4200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The picture below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S4200 and ZS35.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Panasonic ZS35 to offer extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S4200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S4200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S4200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 543 gr (1.20 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery style | AA | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $200 | $300 |