Fujifilm S4200 vs Sony H90
Portability
67 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
67 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Fujifilm S4200 vs Sony H90 Key Specs
Fujifilm S4200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Released January 2012
Sony H90
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 222g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Revealed February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S4200 vs Sony H90 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm S4200 vs Sony H90, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. The resolution of the Fujifilm S4200 (14MP) and the H90 (16MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm S4200 was unveiled within a month of the H90 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S4200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony H90 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm S4200 matches up vs the H90 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S4200 vs Sony H90 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S4200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S4200 Gallery & Sony H90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4200 over the Sony H90
| Fujifilm S4200 | H90 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H90 over the Fujifilm S4200
| H90 | Fujifilm S4200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4200 and Sony H90
| Fujifilm S4200 | H90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | February 2012 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S4200 vs Sony H90 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm S4200 enjoys external dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") along with a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs) while the Sony H90 has specifications of 105mm x 60mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S4200 vs Sony H90 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S4200 against the H90.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S4200 and H90 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm S4200 vs Sony H90 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S4200 and H90.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Sony H90 to provide greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively.
Fujifilm S4200 vs Sony H90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm S4200
Portrait photography with Sony H90
good MP (14MP)
provides face detection focus
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S4200 Street photography factors
Sony H90 Street photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition (543g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (222g)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm S4200
Sports photography with Sony H90
excellent zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (24-384mm 16.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Fujifilm S4200
Travel photography with Sony H90
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (576mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (543 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
lighter than average in class (222g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (384mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S4200 Landscape photography features
Sony H90 Landscape photography features
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Timelapse function
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S4200 Vlogging highlights
Sony H90 Vlogging highlights
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (543 grams)
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic port
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm S4200 vs Sony H90 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 3.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 543 grams (1.20 lb) | 222 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 290 shots |
| Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $230 |
