Fujifilm S4500 vs Samsung ST95
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Fujifilm S4500 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S4500 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Fujifilm S4500 versus Samsung ST95, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S4500 (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is fairly close and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm S4500 was manufactured 12 months after the ST95 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S4500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm S4500 grades versus the ST95 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S4500 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S4500 & Samsung ST95. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S4500 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4500 over the Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm S4500 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Fujifilm S4500
| ST95 | Fujifilm S4500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4500 and Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm S4500 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S4500 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S4500 features physical measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S4500 versus Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S4500 compared to the ST95.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S4500 and ST95 is 67 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm S4500 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The picture underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S4500 and ST95.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung ST95 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S4500 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S4500 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm S4500 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S4500 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S4500 | Samsung ST95 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 543 gr (1.20 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $230 | $145 |