Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320
75 Imaging
33 Features
26 Overall
30
![Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd front Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Fujifilm-FinePix-S8100fd.jpg)
![Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VR-320/Olympus-VR-320-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 405g - 111 x 78 x 79mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S8100fd (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm S8100fd was brought out 3 years earlier than the VR-320 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm S8100fd matches up vs the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd and Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm S8100fd Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8100fd over the Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm S8100fd | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S8100fd
VR-320 | Fujifilm S8100fd | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8100fd and Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm S8100fd | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S8100fd enjoys outside measurements of 111mm x 78mm x 79mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S8100fd against the VR-320.
![Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S8100fd-vs-Olympus-VR-320-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S8100fd and VR-320 is 75 and 94 respectively.
![Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S8100fd-vs-Olympus-VR-320-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S8100fd and VR-320.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus VR-320 to give greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S8100fd is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S8100fd-vs-Olympus-VR-320-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S8100fd-vs-Olympus-VR-320-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S8100fd vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-01-15 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-486mm (18.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.80 m (Auto ISO (800)) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 30 fps, 320 x 240 30 fps | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 405g (0.89 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 78 x 79mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC/MMC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $300 | $179 |