Fujifilm S8200 vs Kodak Sport
61 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Fujifilm S8200 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm S8200 vs Kodak Sport Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Fujifilm S8200 vs Kodak Sport, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and Sport (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S8200 was launched 2 years after the Sport which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Kodak Sport being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm S8200 grades versus the Sport in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S8200 vs Kodak Sport Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S8200 & Kodak EasyShare Sport. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S8200 Gallery & Kodak Sport Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Kodak Sport
| Fujifilm S8200 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Sharper display (+348k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Fujifilm S8200
| Sport | Fujifilm S8200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Kodak Sport
| Fujifilm S8200 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S8200 vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S8200 features outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Kodak Sport has dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm S8200 vs Kodak Sport in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 versus the Sport.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8200 and Sport is 61 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm S8200 vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S8200 and Sport.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S8200 to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S8200 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S8200 vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S8200 vs Kodak Sport Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Kodak EasyShare Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1250 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $450 | $155 |
