Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus VR-320
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm S8300 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S8300 was introduced 18 months after the VR-320 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm S8300 scores versus the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S8300 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S8300 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8300 over the Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm S8300 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 18 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S8300
| VR-320 | Fujifilm S8300 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S8300 and Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm S8300 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S8300 has got outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S8300 against the VR-320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8300 and VR-320 is 61 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The picture below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8300 and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Fujifilm S8300 to provide extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S8300 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8300 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8300 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/7000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $200 | $179 |