Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/512bb/512bbee0e7ca7703ba6c42c2e4cab9dd6b1c7d47" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S8400W front Fujifilm FinePix S8400W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc9/47cc9bc94afeaa31cc3dde1b811c34d098a7d562" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Released January 2015
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS40
- Successor is Panasonic ZS50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and the ZS45 (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The Fujifilm S8400W was introduced 21 months earlier than the ZS45 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS45 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm S8400W grades against the ZS45 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S8400W and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S8400W Gallery and Panasonic ZS45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Panasonic ZS45
Fujifilm S8400W | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Fujifilm S8400W
ZS45 | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | ![]() | March 2013 | Fresher by 21 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Panasonic ZS45
Fujifilm S8400W | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S8400W features physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS45 has proportions of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W compared to the ZS45.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e96b1/e96b1f69d91cdab4d47e966860e8038c558adab5" alt="Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8400W and ZS45 is 61 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aded/7adedab1edbcd64b228635d738e02f4fa7e10fc0" alt="Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8400W and ZS45.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution and you should expect comparable quality of pictures but you should always factor the release date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm S8400W will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da557/da55737fbb91e0c638161f025ae193186b488e72" alt="Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6267/c62678a4702860e74483aecb398de702406a3e83" alt="Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm S8400W vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ57 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1056mm (44.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 249 gr (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 350 photographs |
Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $300 |