Clicky

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S8400W front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Fujifilm S8400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Revealed March 2013
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm S8400W versus Ricoh CX1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm S8400W was manufactured 4 years later than the CX1 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm S8400W grades versus the CX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Ricoh CX1

 Fujifilm S8400W CX1 
IntroducedMarch 2013February 2009More recent by 50 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Fujifilm S8400W

 CX1 Fujifilm S8400W 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Ricoh CX1

 Fujifilm S8400W CX1 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S8400W comes with physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm S8400W versus Ricoh CX1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W and the CX1.

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8400W and CX1 is 61 and 93 respectively.

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The graphic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S8400W and CX1.

Plainly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Fujifilm S8400W to result in greater detail due to its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S8400W is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W Portrait photography information
Ricoh CX1 Portrait photography information
40
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
25
focusing manually
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W Street photography info
Ricoh CX1 Street photography info
41
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S8400W
Sports photography with Ricoh CX1
53
excellent zoom range (24-1056mm 44.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Travel photography camera
52
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
long reach (1056mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (670g)
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
59
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
megapixel count low (9MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S8400W
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX1
47
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
42
focusing manually
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual mode not possible
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W Vlogging details
Ricoh CX1 Vlogging details
24
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of mic socket
heavier than competition in class (670g)
28
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8400W and Ricoh CX1
 Fujifilm FinePix S8400WRicoh CX1
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm FinePix S8400W Ricoh CX1
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2013-03-22 2009-02-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 9MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1056mm (44.0x) 28-200mm (7.1x)
Largest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670g (1.48 lbs) 180g (0.40 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Battery style AA -
Battery model 4 x AA DB-70
Self timer - Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $300 $299