Clicky

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix S8500 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm S8500
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/7000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1104mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Announced January 2013
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Following is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm S8500 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S8500 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Fujifilm S8500 was brought out 18 months after the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S8500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm S8500 grades against the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8500 over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm S8500 VR-320 
LaunchedJanuary 2013July 2011More modern by 18 months
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S8500

 VR-320 Fujifilm S8500 

Common features in the Fujifilm S8500 and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm S8500 VR-320 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S8500 has outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm S8500 versus Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S8500 vs the VR-320.

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8500 and VR-320 is 61 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing specs. The image here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8500 and VR-320.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Fujifilm S8500 to produce extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S8500 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8500 Portrait photography details
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography details
32
resolution is good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
33
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S8500 Street photography info
Olympus VR-320 Street photography info
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competition (670g)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S8500
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
53
incredible zoom range (24-1104mm 46.0 x zoom)
great max shutter speed (1/7,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S8500
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
52
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (1104mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (670 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
70
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S8500 Landscape photography information
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography information
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
42
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8500 Vlogging factors
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging factors
24
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have external mic jack
heavier than competition (670 grams)
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S8500 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8500 and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm FinePix S8500Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix S8500 Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-01-07 2011-07-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1104mm (46.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 0cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 200k dots -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/7000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.70 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 gr (1.48 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $500 $179