Clicky

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
76
Imaging
40
Features
41
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix S8600 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm S8600
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-900mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 450g - 121 x 81 x 65mm
  • Released January 2014
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Fujifilm S8600 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S8600 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm S8600 was manufactured 2 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8600 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm S8600 grades against the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8600 over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm S8600 VR-320 
LaunchedJanuary 2014July 2011More modern by 31 months
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S8600

 VR-320 Fujifilm S8600 

Common features in the Fujifilm S8600 and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm S8600 VR-320 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S8600 has got physical measurements of 121mm x 81mm x 65mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 2.6") and a weight of 450 grams (0.99 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm S8600 versus Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S8600 compared to the VR-320.

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8600 and VR-320 is 76 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The image below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8600 and VR-320.

All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Fujifilm S8600 to render greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S8600 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8600 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography factors
37
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S8600 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Street photography advice
49
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S8600
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
55
great zoom range (25-900mm 36.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
great battery life (410 per charge)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S8600
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
63
great battery life (410 shots)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
long reach (900mm)
no Timelapse function
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
70
lighter than others (158 grams)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S8600 Landscape photography information
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography information
46
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
great battery life (410 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse function
42
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8600 Vlogging features
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
27
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone socket
32
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than others (158 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S8600 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8600 and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm FinePix S8600Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S8600 Olympus VR-320
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-01-06 2011-07-19
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-900mm (36.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 7cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 8.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.00 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 450g (0.99 lb) 158g (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 121 x 81 x 65mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 2.6") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 photos -
Form of battery AA -
Battery ID 3 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $200 $179