Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-20
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
93 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2014
Ricoh WG-20
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm S9200 versus Ricoh WG-20, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm S9200 was revealed about the same time to the WG-20 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm S9200 grades vs the WG-20 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Ricoh WG-20
| Fujifilm S9200 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Fujifilm S9200
| WG-20 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Ricoh WG-20
| Fujifilm S9200 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | February 2014 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9200 has physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S9200 versus Ricoh WG-20 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the WG-20.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9200 and WG-20 is 61 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The image below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9200 and WG-20.
To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S9200 to resolve more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh WG-20 Portrait photography factors
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
features face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
offers face detection focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-20 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
environment proof
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm S9200
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-20
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
features tracking focus
good battery power (500 CIPA)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proof
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Fujifilm S9200
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-20
good battery power (500 per charge)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-20 Landscape photography details
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good battery power (500 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-20 as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
offers face detection focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-01-06 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 164 gr (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 260 images |
| Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $300 | $370 |
