Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-50
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Fujifilm S9200 and Ricoh WG-50, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm S9200 was released 4 years before the WG-50 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm S9200 scores vs the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Ricoh WG-50
| Fujifilm S9200 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Fujifilm S9200
| WG-50 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | January 2014 | More recent by 41 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Ricoh WG-50
| Fujifilm S9200 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9200 has got external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S9200 and Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 against the WG-50.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and WG-50 is 61 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9200 and WG-50.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP and you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you have to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm S9200 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $280 |
