Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST30
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
98 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 87g - 82 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST30 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST30, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and ST30 (10MP) and the Fujifilm S9200 (1/2.3") and ST30 (1/3") possess different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm S9200 was revealed 3 years later than the ST30 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm S9200 matches up against the ST30 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST30 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 and Samsung ST30. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery and Samsung ST30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Samsung ST30
| Fujifilm S9200 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST30 over the Fujifilm S9200
| ST30 | Fujifilm S9200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung ST30
| Fujifilm S9200 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST30 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9200 provides exterior dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST30 has measurements of 82mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 87 grams (0.19 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST30 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 compared to the ST30.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and ST30 is 61 and 98 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST30 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9200 and ST30.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm S9200 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm S9200 will result in more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST30 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung ST30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung ST30 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) | 87 grams (0.19 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 82 x 52 x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $300 | $55 |