Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST6500
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
99 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST6500 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung ST6500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the ST6500 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm S9200 was launched 3 years after the ST6500 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm S9200 grades against the ST6500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST6500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Samsung ST6500. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Samsung ST6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Samsung ST6500
| Fujifilm S9200 | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | January 2011 | Newer by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Fujifilm S9200
| ST6500 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung ST6500
| Fujifilm S9200 | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S9200 comes with outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung ST6500 has proportions of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung ST6500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 and the ST6500.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9200 and ST6500 is 61 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9200 and ST6500.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images though you should really consider the age of the cameras into account. The more recent Fujifilm S9200 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung ST6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung ST6500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Type of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | - |