Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z980 front
Portability
68
Imaging
35
Features
40
Overall
37

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Kodak Z980
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
  • Announced January 2009
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and Z980 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm S9400W was manufactured 5 years later than the Z980 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Kodak Z980 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades vs the Z980 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Kodak Z980

 Fujifilm S9400W Z980 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014January 2009More recent by 61 months
Screen resolution460k201kCrisper screen (+259k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Fujifilm S9400W

 Z980 Fujifilm S9400W 
Manual focus Very exact focusing

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Kodak Z980

 Fujifilm S9400W Z980 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S9400W features outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Kodak Z980 has proportions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W against the Z980.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and Z980 is 61 and 68 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9400W and Z980.

As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Fujifilm S9400W to show more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S9400W will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography information
Kodak Z980 Portrait photography information
37
good resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
41
you can focus manually
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Street photography camera
Kodak Z980 as a Street photography camera
41
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition (670 grams)
54
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography factors
Kodak Z980 Sports photography factors
55
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
better than average battery (500 per charge)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
34
incredible zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Travel photography camera
Kodak Z980 as a Travel photography camera
54
better than average battery (500 CIPA)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (670g)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
51
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
long reach (624mm)
no Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography features
Kodak Z980 Landscape photography features
44
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
better than average battery (500 shots)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
45
you can focus manually
really wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm S9400W
Vlogging with Kodak Z980
26
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic socket
heavier than competition (670g)
23
really wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z980 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Kodak Z980
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WKodak EasyShare Z980
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Kodak
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Kodak EasyShare Z980
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2014-01-06 2009-01-05
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 12800 6400
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 25
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 26-624mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dot 201k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 201k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/1700s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 6.30 m
Flash modes Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lb) 445 grams (0.98 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures -
Battery form AA -
Battery ID 4 x AA 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $330 $249