Fujifilm S9400W vs Nikon S8200
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
Fujifilm S9400W vs Nikon S8200 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2014
Nikon S8200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S9400W vs Nikon S8200 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Fujifilm S9400W and Nikon S8200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the S8200 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S9400W was announced 2 years later than the S8200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S8200 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores versus the S8200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S9400W vs Nikon S8200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Nikon Coolpix S8200. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Nikon S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Nikon S8200
| Fujifilm S9400W | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | August 2011 | More recent by 29 months |
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| S8200 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 961k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+501k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Nikon S8200
| Fujifilm S9400W | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Nikon S8200 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9400W has got outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Nikon S8200 has dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S9400W and Nikon S8200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the S8200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and S8200 is 61 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Nikon S8200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9400W and S8200.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you really should take the age of the cameras into account. The newer Fujifilm S9400W is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Nikon S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W as a Portrait photography camera
Nikon S8200 as a Portrait photography camera
MP count good (16MP)
includes face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Street photography information
Nikon S8200 Street photography information
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than average in class (670g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch to focus
lighter than average in class (213g)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography advice
Nikon S8200 Sports photography advice
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
great battery (500 per charge)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (25-350mm 14.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (250 shots)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography advice
Nikon S8200 Travel photography advice
great battery (500 shots)
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (670 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
lighter than average in class (213g)
supports touch to focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
great zoom (350mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
not so great battery power (250 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Landscape photography with Nikon S8200
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
great battery (500 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse function
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
not so great battery power (250 shots)
missing Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm S9400W
Vlogging with Nikon S8200
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
display is not selfie friendly
no microphone port
more heavy than average in class (670 grams)
decently wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (213g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm S9400W vs Nikon S8200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Nikon Coolpix S8200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-01-06 | 2011-08-24 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-350mm (14.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 961k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 lbs) | 213g (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 250 photos |
| Battery format | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $330 | $329 |