Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe Fujifilm S9400W was brought out 5 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm S9400W matches up vs the SP-565UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Olympus SP-565UZ
Fujifilm S9400W | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 61 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm S9400W
SP-565UZ | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus SP-565UZ
Fujifilm S9400W | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9400W provides outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the SP-565UZ.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and SP-565UZ is 61 and 72 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9400W and SP-565UZ.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S9400W to resolve greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9400W is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-01-06 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 413 grams (0.91 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Form of battery | AA | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $330 | $400 |