Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Olympus SP-565UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview

Below is a thorough review of the Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The Fujifilm S9400W was brought out 5 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm S9400W matches up vs the SP-565UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 Fujifilm S9400W SP-565UZ 
ReleasedJanuary 2014January 2009More recent by 61 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm S9400W

 SP-565UZ Fujifilm S9400W 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus SP-565UZ

 Fujifilm S9400W SP-565UZ 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9400W provides outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the SP-565UZ.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and SP-565UZ is 61 and 72 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9400W and SP-565UZ.

As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S9400W to resolve greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9400W is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Portrait photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
37
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
39
has manual focus
exports RAW files
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Street photography info
Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography info
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than competitors (670 grams)
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography advice
Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography advice
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
good battery (500 CIPA)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
33
long zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography info
Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography info
54
good battery (500 CIPA)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (670g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
52
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
great zoom (520mm)
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography features
Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography features
44
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good battery (500 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
40
has manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-565UZ as a Vlogging camera
26
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than competitors (670g)
24
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus SP-565UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WOlympus SP-565UZ
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Olympus SP-565UZ
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2014-01-06 2009-01-15
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 12800 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 143
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 26-520mm (20.0x)
Max aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 1s
Highest shutter speed 1/1700s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 10.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Flash settings Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lb) 413 grams (0.91 lb)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 30
DXO Color Depth score not tested 18.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.1
DXO Low light score not tested 68
Other
Battery life 500 shots -
Form of battery AA -
Battery model 4 x AA 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal xD Picture Card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $330 $400