Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2014
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Announced March 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm S9400W versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the Fujifilm S9400W (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Fujifilm S9400W was manufactured 3 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 Fujifilm S9400W GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014March 2010More modern by 47 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Fujifilm S9400W

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Fujifilm S9400W 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 Fujifilm S9400W GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9400W has got outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm S9400W versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 61 and 85 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The pic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9400W and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm S9400W because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Fujifilm S9400W will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S9400W is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography info
37
MP count decent (16MP)
supports face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
36
focusing manually
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Street photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography advice
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (670 grams)
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition in class (355g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
55
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
great battery (500 shots)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have liveview
low fps (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography highlights
54
great battery (500 CIPA)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (670g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
60
lighter than competition in class (355g)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
44
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
great battery (500 shots)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
47
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging advice
26
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (670 grams)
28
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm S9400W vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2014-01-06 2010-03-18
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m 4.50 m
Flash options Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 grams (1.48 pounds) 355 grams (0.78 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos 410 photos
Battery form AA Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $330 $349