Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240

Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Samsung TL240 front
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Additionally referred to as ST5000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 Overview

Following is a extended review of the Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm S9400W was unveiled 4 years after the TL240 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores vs the TL240 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images 

				

					

						
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung TL240

					

					

						
 Fujifilm S9400W TL240 
ReleasedJanuary 2014January 2010More modern by 49 months
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
					

				


				

					

						
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Fujifilm S9400W

					

					

						
 TL240 Fujifilm S9400W 
Screen dimension3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Touch friendly screen  Quickly navigate
					

				


				

					

						
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung TL240

					

					

						
 Fujifilm S9400W TL240 
Manually focus  No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither features selfie screen
					

				

				

	
	
	
	

				

					

						
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison

					

					

						
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9400W enjoys outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the TL240.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9400W and TL240 is 61 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison					

				


				

					

						
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison

					

					

						
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The image underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9400W and TL240.
All in all, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Fujifilm S9400W to produce extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9400W will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

						Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison
					

				


				

					

						
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder

					

					

											

					Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison				


								Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video				

	
	
	
	

				

					
Photography Type Scores

					

				

				
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography advice
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography advice
37
 MP count decent (16 megapixels)
 offers face detect autofocus
 lack of manual focus
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
28
 megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
 lack of manual focus
 no manual control
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
 Fujifilm S9400W as a Street photography camera
 Samsung TL240 as a Street photography camera
41
 image stabilization (Optical)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 heavier than average (670 grams)
60
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 comes with touch focus
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
 more heavy than others (160g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
 Fujifilm S9400W as a Sports photography camera
 Samsung TL240 as a Sports photography camera
55
 excellent zoom range (24-1200mm  50.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 MP count decent (16 megapixels)
 offers tracking focus
 good battery pack (500 shots)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect autofocus
43
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (14MP)
 comes with tracking focus
 no shutter priority
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography details
Samsung TL240 Travel photography details
54
 good battery pack (500 per charge)
 MP count decent (16MP)
 built-in flash
 rather wide (24mm)
 long zoom (1200mm)
 missing Time Lapse mode
 heavier than average (670g)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
60
 comes with touch focus
 megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 doesn't have Timelapse function
 more heavy than others (160 grams)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 wide angle not good (31mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography information
Samsung TL240 Landscape photography information
44
 rather wide (24mm)
 decent sized screen (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 MP count decent (16MP)
 good battery pack (500 shots)
 lack of manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 missing Time Lapse mode
37
 bigger than average screen (3.5")
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
 lack of manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not good (31mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
 no manual control
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
 doesn't have Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging information
Samsung TL240 Vlogging information
26
 rather wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 offers face detect autofocus
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 missing mic jack
 heavier than average (670g)
27
 touchscreen functionality
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 wide angle not good (31mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
 doesn't have microphone port
 more heavy than others (160 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
				
								
				

					

						
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL240 Specifications

					

					

											


					

						Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung TL240
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WSamsung TL240
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Samsung TL240
Also called as - ST5000
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2014-01-06 2010-01-06
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4334 x 3256
Max native ISO 12800 4800
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3.5"
Screen resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/1700s 1/1500s
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 7.00 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 670 gr (1.48 lb) 160 gr (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos -
Battery form AA -
Battery model 4 x AA SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $330 $171