Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210

Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Samsung WB210 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Announced January 2014
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
  • Introduced July 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The Fujifilm S9400W was revealed 2 years after the WB210 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores against the WB210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung WB210

		

		

			
 Fujifilm S9400W WB210 
IntroducedJanuary 2014July 2011More modern by 31 months
Screen resolution460k1kClearer screen (+459k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Fujifilm S9400W

		

		

			
 WB210 Fujifilm S9400W 
Manual focus  More exact focus
Screen size3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Touch friendly screen  Quickly navigate
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB210

		

		

			
 Fujifilm S9400W WB210 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S9400W provides exterior dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB210 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W compared to the WB210.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210 size comparison
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and WB210 is 61 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Generally, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The pic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9400W and WB210.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Fujifilm S9400W to show greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9400W provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
	
			Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Portrait photography with Samsung WB210
37
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 offers face detection focusing
 lack of manual focus
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
39
 you can focus manually
 good megapixels (14MP)
 supports face detection focusing
 no manual control
 external flash not possible
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Street photography details
Samsung WB210 Street photography details
41
 image stabilization (Optical)
 no moving screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
 more heavy than others (670g)
66
 image stabilization (Optical)
 offers focus via touch
 lighter than competition in class (174g)
 no moving screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography details
Samsung WB210 Sports photography details
55
 excellent zoom range (24-1200mm  50.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 offers tracking autofocus
 better than average battery (500 per charge)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no phase detect AF
38
 image stabilization (Optical)
 good megapixels (14 megapixels)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB210 Travel photography highlights
54
 better than average battery (500 per charge)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 great zoom (1200mm)
 no Timelapse mode
 more heavy than others (670g)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
71
 lighter than competition in class (174g)
 offers focus via touch
 good megapixels (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (24mm)
 very long zoom (288mm)
 lack of Timelapse mode
 display isn't selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f2.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
 Fujifilm S9400W as a Landscape photography camera
 Samsung WB210 as a Landscape photography camera
44
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 screen is a decent size (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 better than average battery (500 per charge)
 lack of manual focus
 cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
 no Timelapse mode
46
 you can focus manually
 relatively wide (24mm)
 screen larger than average (3.5 inch)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 good megapixels (14 megapixels)
 cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f2.9)
 no manual control
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW files
 lack of Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging advice
Samsung WB210 Vlogging advice
26
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 offers face detection focusing
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 no external microphone jack
 more heavy than others (670g)
33
 relatively wide (24mm)
 touchscreen capability
 image stabilization (Optical)
 supports face detection focusing
 lighter than competition in class (174g)
 slow max aperture (f2.9)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
 lack of external microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	

		

			
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB210 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB210
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WSamsung WB210
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Samsung WB210
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2014-01-06 2011-07-19
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 12800 1600
Highest boosted ISO - 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
Continuous AF    
AF single    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
AF multi area    
Live view AF    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.9-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3.5 inches
Display resolution 460k dot 1k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash range 7.00 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 670g (1.48 lbs) 174g (0.38 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos -
Battery form AA -
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal microSC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $330 $279