Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Samsung WB250F front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
44
Overall
40

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2014
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F Overview

Following is a in-depth analysis of the Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm S9400W was brought out 13 months after the WB250F making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores versus the WB250F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung WB250F

 Fujifilm S9400W WB250F 
LaunchedJanuary 2014January 2013More modern by 13 months

Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Fujifilm S9400W

 WB250F Fujifilm S9400W 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB250F

 Fujifilm S9400W WB250F 
Manually focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Display resolution460k460kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S9400W features physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the WB250F.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and WB250F is 61 and 93 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing specs. The pic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9400W and WB250F.

All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S9400W to produce greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S9400W is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB250F Portrait photography highlights
37
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
36
decent MP (14 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Street photography features
Samsung WB250F Street photography features
41
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than competition in class (670g)
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (226 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Sports photography with Samsung WB250F
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery (500 CIPA)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
52
great zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Travel photography camera
54
great battery (500 per charge)
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
69
lighter than competitors in class (226 grams)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (432mm)
no Time Lapse function
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Landscape photography with Samsung WB250F
44
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
great battery (500 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
44
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB250F as a Vlogging camera
26
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
35
reasonably wide (24mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (226g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no mic support
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB250F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB250F
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WSamsung WB250F
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Samsung WB250F
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2014-01-06 2013-01-07
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m -
Flash options Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670g (1.48 lb) 226g (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures -
Type of battery AA -
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $330 $250