Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB35F
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm S9400W was unveiled at a similar time to the WB35F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores vs the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm S9400W | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm S9400W
| WB35F | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm S9400W | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2014 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9400W enjoys physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the WB35F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and WB35F is 61 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The visual underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9400W and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of photos although you may want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung WB35F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-01-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $330 | $130 |