Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB50F
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
92 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB50F Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm S9400W was announced about the same time to the WB50F which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades vs the WB50F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm S9400W | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Fujifilm S9400W
| WB50F | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm S9400W | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | January 2014 | Similar age | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9400W offers exterior measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has measurements of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the WB50F.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and WB50F is 61 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9400W and WB50F.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs but you might want to factor the age of the products into consideration.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-01-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | 207 grams (0.46 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery type | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $330 | $180 |