Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H400
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H400 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2014
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Introduced February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H400 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Fujifilm S9400W and Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the H400 (20MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm S9400W was unveiled within a month of the H400 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades vs the H400 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H400 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery and Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Sony H400
| Fujifilm S9400W | H400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| H400 | Fujifilm S9400W |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Sony H400
| Fujifilm S9400W | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | February 2014 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9400W has got physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Sony H400 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S9400W and Sony H400 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W compared to the H400.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and H400 is 61 and 62 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The pic below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9400W and H400.
All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Sony H400 to deliver more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Portrait photography with Sony H400
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
MP count decent (20MP)
provides face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Street photography details
Sony H400 Street photography details
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition (670g)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than others in class (628 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Sports photography with Sony H400
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
great battery (500 CIPA)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
great zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
provides tracking focus
low frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography advice
Sony H400 Travel photography advice
great battery (500 shots)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (670g)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
MP count decent (20MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (1550mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (628g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography factors
Sony H400 Landscape photography factors
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
great battery (500 CIPA)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W as a Vlogging camera
Sony H400 as a Vlogging camera
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (670 grams)
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
includes mic support
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
heavier than others in class (628 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm S9400W vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-01-06 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | 201 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 8.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 X 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 628 grams (1.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery style | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $330 | $268 |