Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91294/91294afcddfb537e41c3a35a65fed92124da3a89" alt="Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ff07/7ff0788d76e3c926f9e9c195b075bf6cf4318734" alt="Nikon Coolpix S9700 front Nikon Coolpix S9700 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Replaced the Nikon S9500
- Successor is Nikon S9900
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Fujifilm SL240 versus Nikon S9700, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and the S9700 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Fujifilm SL240 was brought out 3 years prior to the S9700 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9700 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm SL240 grades against the S9700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 and Nikon Coolpix S9700. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery and Nikon S9700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Nikon S9700
Fujifilm SL240 | S9700 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Fujifilm SL240
S9700 | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Nikon S9700
Fujifilm SL240 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm SL240 has got physical measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") and a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Nikon S9700 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm SL240 versus Nikon S9700 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 against the S9700.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76d4b/76d4b03a162a1ebecbdfefee3856f1e7f4d8faab" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 size comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL240 and S9700 is 67 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e62ba/e62ba0625e5cf8a9b49b32cf4422b6b3b054fdd4" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm SL240 and S9700.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Nikon S9700 to deliver extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older Fujifilm SL240 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/078d4/078d4073d7fa2ee2ac59a8b10693d967b3f92375" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 sensor size comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56c4f/56c4f24abb417384e6009cd8d4c3de84f416463b" alt="Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm SL240 vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-01-05 | 2014-02-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 510 gr (1.12 pounds) | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 300 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-85 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $280 | $350 |