Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh CX4
67 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm SL240 was announced 17 months later than the CX4 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm SL240 scores against the CX4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix SL240 & Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL240 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Ricoh CX4
Fujifilm SL240 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | August 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm SL240
CX4 | Fujifilm SL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL240 and Ricoh CX4
Fujifilm SL240 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm SL240 has got outer dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") and a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh CX4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm SL240 compared to the CX4.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL240 and CX4 is 67 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm SL240 and CX4.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Fujifilm SL240 to produce greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm SL240 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm SL240 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix SL240 | Ricoh CX4 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2010-08-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 510 gr (1.12 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-85 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $280 | $211 |