Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9
67 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
85 Imaging
56 Features
78 Overall
64
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Fujifilm SL300 versus Olympus E-PL9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and the E-PL9 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm SL300 (1/2.3") and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm SL300 was launched 7 years earlier than the E-PL9 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm SL300 grades against the E-PL9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix SL300 & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm SL300 Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Olympus E-PL9
Fujifilm SL300 | E-PL9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Fujifilm SL300
E-PL9 | Fujifilm SL300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | January 2012 | More modern by 74 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Olympus E-PL9
Fujifilm SL300 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm SL300 features outer measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has specifications of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
See the Fujifilm SL300 versus Olympus E-PL9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 vs the E-PL9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL300 and E-PL9 is 67 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The pic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm SL300 and E-PL9.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm SL300 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-PL9 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm SL300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix SL300 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2018-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 8.6 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 510g (1.12 pounds) | 380g (0.84 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 350 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-85 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $280 | $599 |