Clicky

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9

Portability
67
Imaging
38
Features
39
Overall
38
Fujifilm FinePix SL300 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
Portability
85
Imaging
56
Features
78
Overall
64

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs

Fujifilm SL300
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Announced January 2012
Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Fujifilm SL300 versus Olympus E-PL9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm SL300 (14MP) and the E-PL9 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm SL300 (1/2.3") and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm SL300 was launched 7 years earlier than the E-PL9 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm SL300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm SL300 grades against the E-PL9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL300 over the Olympus E-PL9

 Fujifilm SL300 E-PL9 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Fujifilm SL300

 E-PL9 Fujifilm SL300 
IntroducedFebruary 2018January 2012More modern by 74 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kSharper display (+580k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm SL300 and Olympus E-PL9

 Fujifilm SL300 E-PL9 
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm SL300 features outer measurements of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has specifications of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).

See the Fujifilm SL300 versus Olympus E-PL9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm SL300 vs the E-PL9.

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm SL300 and E-PL9 is 67 and 85 respectively.

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The pic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm SL300 and E-PL9.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm SL300 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-PL9 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm SL300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm SL300
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL9
38
MP count good (14MP)
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
73
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
exports RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm SL300 Street photography details
Olympus E-PL9 Street photography details
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (510g)
84
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
includes focus by touch
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm SL300 Sports photography advice
Olympus E-PL9 Sports photography advice
47
long zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
max fps low (1.0 fps)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm SL300 Travel photography info
Olympus E-PL9 Travel photography info
54
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long zoom (720mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (510 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
77
has bluetooth
includes focus by touch
good resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm SL300 Landscape photography information
Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography information
41
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
80
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm SL300
Vlogging with Olympus E-PL9
24
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
heavier than competition in class (510g)
35
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm SL300 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm SL300 and Olympus E-PL9
 Fujifilm FinePix SL300Olympus PEN E-PL9
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix SL300 Olympus PEN E-PL9
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2012-01-05 2018-02-08
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Max boosted ISO 6400 25600
Minimum native ISO 64 200
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 121
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 24-720mm (30.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.9 -
Macro focus range 2cm -
Number of lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 460k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Highest quiet shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 8.6 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) 7.60 m (at ISO 200)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 510g (1.12 pounds) 380g (0.84 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images 350 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-85 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported)
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $280 $599