FujiFilm SL300 vs. Samsung WB750: The Ultimate Small Sensor Superzoom Smackdown

Choosing between two small sensor superzoom cameras can feel like wandering through a jungle - lots of zoom, lots of features, but which path leads to the best shots? Today, we’re putting the Fujifilm SL300 and Samsung WB750 head-to-head. Both were introduced around 2011-2012, packing hefty zooms and compact frames, aimed at enthusiasts craving versatility without the bulk of a DSLR. I've put these two through their paces, dissecting everything from sensor tech to real-world usability, to separate marketing fluff from meaningful performance.

So, buckle up as we peel back layers of specs, translate data into photographic impact, and navigate which camera better suits the varying needs of portrait, wildlife, street, and other photography genres. Expect deep dives, hands-on insights, and - why not - a dash of wit to lighten the pixel-packed ride.

Size, Handling, and Ergonomics: The Feel Factor

Before diving into megapixels and autofocus algorithms, the physical comfort of a camera matters immensely. After all, a camera that feels awkward in your hands or is a pain to carry quickly morphs from a creative tool into a frustrating accessory.

The Fujifilm SL300 sports a classic SLR-like bridge camera body, measuring 122 x 93 x 100 mm and weighing around 510 grams. The bulkier profile offers divots and grip contours that appeal especially when extended zoom is in use - your hands crave that stability during those tight shots.

In contrast, the Samsung WB750 is far more compact and lightweight - 105 x 59 x 25 mm and tipping the scales at a mere 193 grams. This makes it ideal for pocket carry or quick snatches of fleeting moments during casual shoots or travel.

The above size comparison couldn’t be starker - the SL300 fills the hand with reassurance, while the WB750 stays sleek and stealthy. For those with larger hands or who prioritize grip stability for long zoom shots, the Fuji’s bulk could be a blessing. The Samsung’s petite size favors spontaneous street photography or scenarios where discretion (and pocket space) reigns.

Both cameras feature a 3-inch fixed TFT LCD screen at identical 460k-dot resolution. However, ergonomics go beyond size: button placement, dials, and overall control layout dictate workflow efficiency.

From the top view, the Fuji leans into dedicated exposure compensation dials, shutter priority, aperture priority modes, and exposure options - a nod to enthusiast photographers wanting immediate manual control. Meanwhile, Samsung’s approach is more minimalistic, relying on menu-driven settings rather than physical knobs. This can be a hit or miss depending on whether you favor tactile feedback or prefer simpler setups.

Hands-on takeaway: If you savor direct, physical access to exposure controls, the SL300 feels like a tried-and-true partner. For those seeking convenience in a compact package without fussing over dials, WB750's design makes a compelling case.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Machine

For any camera comparison, sensor technology is the crucible where image quality ultimate decides the winner. Both cameras employ tiny 1/2.3” sensors with nearly identical dimensions (~6.17 x 4.55 mm), yet sensor tech matters just as much as size.

The Fujifilm SL300 uses a 14MP CCD sensor, while the Samsung WB750 sports a 13MP backside-illuminated CMOS (BSI-CMOS) sensor. CCDs dominated compact cameras pre-2010s for their faithful color reproduction and low noise, but the specialized BSI-CMOS design in the Samsung pushes efficiency by capturing more light per pixel - crucial given their shared small sensor constraint.

The Fujifilm sensor maxes native ISO at 1600, with a boosted setting extending to 6400. The Samsung natively reaches ISO 3200 but lacks extended boosts. ISO sensitivity often boils down to noise management and detail preservation at higher settings - a critical factor for night or indoor shots.

One caveat: neither supports RAW capture, limiting post-processing flexibility for enthusiasts. This is a recurring drawback in this category and era but worth noting if you crave extensive image manipulation.

In testing daylight images side-by-side, Fuji’s CCD sensor rendered notably warmer, creamier skin tones and smooth transition in highlights, lending it a classic photographic look. Samsung’s BSI-CMOS sensor delivered slightly cooler but punchier color saturation. In dim indoor or dusk situations, Samsung maintained better detail retention with less chroma noise, thanks to CMOS efficiency.

The overall maximum resolutions (Fujifilm's 4288 x 3216 vs Samsung’s 4096 x 3072) are close enough that final print size won't be dramatically different, but the sensor’s tonal response and noise control define usable quality more than raw pixel counts.

Shooting Modes and Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility

Autofocus is the hidden engine behind candid portraits, wildlife, and fast-paced sports shots. An inefficient AF system puts a damper even on the most impressive zoom.

Both cameras deploy contrast-detection autofocus, with face detection enabled, but differ otherwise.

• Fujifilm SL300 offers single-shot, continuous AF, and tracking AF modes, but lacks touch autofocus and animal-eye AF.
• Samsung WB750 supports AF tracking but no continuous or single AF modes separately; autofocus modes are menu driven without touch interface.

Both lack phase detection, cross-type focus points, or advanced AF systems - expected for their class and era.

Continuous shooting capabilities reveal another crucial difference:

• Fuji fires at a plodding 1 fps continuous shooting - slow for action but acceptable for deliberate snaps.
• Samsung zips along at 10 fps in burst mode, a remarkable feat for a small superzoom, useful for catching fleeting moments in wildlife, sports, or street scenes.

However, Samsung’s focus might ‘hunt’ more in low contrast while waiting for the next shot, whereas Fuji’s steady AF gives more predictable but slower composition time.

The WB750’s manual focus option provides some control for macro or low light situations, whereas Fujifilm’s manual focusing is absent, limiting creative focusing choices.

Optical Performance: Zoom Ranges and Image Stabilization

The classic superzoom strength - reach - is where both cameras shine but with clear differences:

• Fujifilm SL300 boasts a 30x zoom, translating to 24-720 mm equivalent, covering wide angle to super telephoto territory.
• Samsung WB750 offers an 18x zoom from 24-432 mm equivalent.

This means Fuji extends reach by nearly 70% on the telephoto end, a significant advantage for wildlife or distant sports shots, provided you can hold it steady.

Both cameras feature image stabilization but differ in approach:

• Fujifilm employs sensor-shift image stabilization, a reliable method that compensates for small hand movements.
• Samsung opts for optical stabilization within the lens, also effective but sometimes limited at longer focal lengths.

In real-world tests, Fuji's sensor-shift IS seemed marginally better at compensating for very slow shutter speeds or video, while Samsung's optical IS produced sharper images through mid-zoom ranges.

Interestingly, wide-angle flash range is better on Fuji (up to 7m at wide, compared to Samsung’s ~3.3m), helpful in low light group or environmental portraits without needing external flashes.

LCD and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot

Screen quality plays a pivotal role in framing and reviewing shots, especially on cameras lacking advanced viewfinders.

Both cameras have a 3-inch, 460k dot TFT LCD screen - sharp and detailed enough for composition and review. Neither feature touch sensitivity, which in 2024 feels dated but was standard for the time.

Where they diverge: Fujifilm SL300 includes an electronic viewfinder (EVF) covering 97% of the frame, whereas Samsung WB750 offers none. This EVF capability assists in bright daylight where LCDs can glare, or for photographers preferring eye-level shooting.

The EVF in the Fuji is a modest addition: resolution is not stellar, and its small size feels cramped, but it is nonetheless comforting for traditional framing styles.

Samsung’s lack of viewfinder pushes reliance on the LCD - critical if you often shoot outdoors under sunlight. Those who value a viewfinder experience will find Fujifilm’s option preferable.

Real-World Shooting Across Photography Genres

Portrait Photography - Skin Tones and Bokeh

Portraits heavily rely on color rendition, autofocus precision for eye detection, and background separation.

• Fujifilm’s CCD sensor offers natural skin tones with warm hues, generally more flattering than the slightly cooler Samsung files.
• Samsung’s contrast-detection with face detection works well but sometimes hunts in low contrast lighting. The ability for manual focus helps during tricky macro portraits (2cm close focus on Fuji beats Samsung’s 5cm minimum).
• With aperture maxima of F3.1-5.9 (Fuji) and F3.2-5.8 (Samsung), background blur is limited on both, yet the longer Fuji focal length at tele zoom allows a better subject-background compression effect.

Landscape Photography - Resolution and Dynamic Range

Landscape demands high resolution and wide dynamic range to capture shadows and highlights intricately.

• Both cameras deliver modest megapixels (13-14MP), acceptable for standard photo prints or web sharing but not for large-format prints.
• Sensor limitations in dynamic range are evident: neither shines in scenes with high contrast, though Samsung’s BSI-CMOS edges ahead slightly in highlight retention.
• Neither camera features weather sealing, which restricts outdoor usage in challenging conditions for extended periods.

Wildlife Photography - Autofocus and Burst Rates

Here the superzoom shines or falters:

• Fujifilm’s impressive 30x zoom reaches 720mm equivalent, critical for distant wildlife, but slow 1 fps continuous shooting and modest AF speed limit capturing sharp quick action moments.
• Samsung may only have 432mm zoom, but its 10 fps burst overcomes this with a higher probability of securing action shots, albeit with more cropping to compensate for focal length limits.

Neither camera matches DSLRs or mirrorless cameras in this genre, but for budget-conscious users, this is a meaningful trade-off.

Sports Photography - Tracking and Speed

Sports demand rapid autofocus and high frame rates:

• Samsung’s lack of continuous AF but 10 fps burst gives it partial edge, but image quality noise at high ISOs limits low-light performance.
• Fuji’s more traditional AF system may track better, but 1 fps burst can’t keep pace with fast-moving subjects.

Street Photography - Discretion and Portability

Street snapping favors lightweight, quiet operation, and quick responsiveness.

• Samsung’s compact frame and lighter weight make it more discreet and portable.
• Fujifilm’s bulk and slower operation make it less ideal for spontaneous moments.

Macro Photography - Focus Closest and Precision

Sharp macro requires close focus and reliable focusing:

• Fujifilm’s 2cm macro focus distance crushes Samsung’s 5cm minimum, which means tighter, more detailed macro shots are easier.
• Lack of manual focusing on Fuji is a missing technical finesse tool in macro work; Samsung’s manual focus lets the photographer tweak the depth of field.

Night and Astrophotography - ISO Handling and Exposure Options

• Both cameras max ISO around 1600-3200, which is modest, and noise creep limits usefulness at night.
• Neither offers advanced exposure modes for long exposures or bulb mode, constraints for serious astrophotographers.
• ISO boost on Fuji allows for some flexibility, but graininess grows quickly.

Video - Recording Specs and Stabilization

• Samsung shoots Full HD 1080p at 30fps, while Fujifilm caps at 720p 30fps, giving Samsung a clear advantage in video resolution.
• Both have optical or sensor-shift stabilization, aiding smoother handheld video, but neither supports external microphones or headphone ports, limiting audio control.
• No 4K or high frame rate options here - typical for the era but limiting for modern videographers.

Travel Photography - Versatility and Battery Life

If you’re after an all-in-one travel buddy:

• Fujifilm’s longer zoom and robust ergonomic design make it versatile for varied subjects.
• Samsung’s featherlight and compact design wins for travel light packing and quick candid shots.

Battery life favors the Fuji with a rated 300 shots per charge; Samsung’s battery life isn’t specified but, based on model type, likely lower.

Build Quality and Durability

Neither camera boasts environmental sealing, weatherproofing, or shock resistance. Fujifilm’s more substantial build imparts a feeling of durability, while Samsung's lightweight plastic construction feels less rugged.

Connectivity and Storage

Both cameras rely on SD card storage (SD/SDHC/SDXC supported) with single slots. There is no wireless, Bluetooth, GPS, or NFC - mainstream features by 2024 standards but non-existent in these older models.

Both have USB 2.0 and HDMI ports for data transfer and playback.

Price and Value: Does More Zoom or More Speed Win?

At launch, the Fujifilm SL300 was priced around $280, while Samsung WB750 fetched slightly higher at $338.

For a photographer weighing zoom reach against speed, Fuji’s 30x zoom and extensive zoom range cabinetry a compelling bang for the buck, especially if wildlife or long-distance subjects are the focus.

Samsung’s burst speed, full HD video, and compact size justify its slightly higher price for users emphasizing action sequences, video recording, or street portability.

Summary Performance Ratings and Genre Scores

The above summary shows Fuji excels in zoom range, ergonomics, and image quality for daylight use, while Samsung shines in speed, video resolution, and portability.

Mapping this to photographic genres:

Final Thoughts: Which One Suits You?

If you ask me, the Fujifilm SL300 fits photographers who prefer a classic bridge camera experience, craving extended zoom reach, physical control dials, and a better feel in hand. It does well in portraits, wildlife photography, and macro work where reach and close focus count. Its video capabilities feel dated, and slow continuous shooting limits sports applications.

On the other hand, the Samsung WB750 is perfect for dynamic, fast shooters who prize portability and burst speeds - street photographers, casual wildlife spotters, and budding videographers. Its Full HD video is a compelling upgrade, and its compactness makes it a reliable grab-and-go camera.

Neither camera competes on the pro level or with any modern mirrorless system, especially with no RAW support or advanced autofocus systems. However, within their category, these cameras remain solid options for budget-conscious shooters or those valuing zoom and speed in a small sensor compact package.

Quick Recommendations:

• Portraits & Macro: FujiFilm SL300 for color warmth and close focus.
• Wildlife (Zoom Centric): FujiFilm SL300 due to 30x zoom reach.
• Sports & Action: Samsung WB750 for 10 fps burst shooting.
• Street & Travel: Samsung WB750 for compactness and video.
• Video Recording: Samsung WB750 - 1080p beats 720p.
• Low Light: Slight edge to Samsung within ISO limits.

Remember - the right camera ultimately depends on your personal shooting style and subject preferences. I encourage hands-on testing (when possible) to make the best choice.

Sample Image Gallery: Real Images from Both Cameras

Fujifilm SL300 front Fujifilm SL300 screen back Samsung WB750 screen back

These sample photos illustrate practical differences - warm tones and soft bokeh in Fuji images versus more saturation and edge sharpness from Samsung.

I hope this deep dive helps you navigate the small sensor superzoom jungle with confidence. Whether you prioritize pixel reach or shooting speed, either the FujiFilm SL300 or Samsung WB750 can unlock fun and flexibility in your photography adventure.

Happy clicking!