Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL102
93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm T400 was manufactured 3 years after the SL102 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm T400 matches up vs the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix T400 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm T400 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm T400 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 37 months |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm T400
| SL102 | Fujifilm T400 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm T400 and Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm T400 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm T400 features external dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm T400 versus the SL102.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm T400 and SL102 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm T400 and SL102.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm T400 to provide more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm T400 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm T400 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $150 | $130 |