Clicky

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
46
Overall
43
Fujifilm FinePix XP120 front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Fujifilm XP120
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2017
  • Replacement is Fujifilm XP130
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Released February 2012
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm XP120 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP120 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm XP120 was launched 4 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm XP120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm XP120 scores versus the TG-820 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP120 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 Fujifilm XP120 TG-820 iHS 
ReleasedJanuary 2017February 2012More recent by 60 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Fujifilm XP120

 TG-820 iHS Fujifilm XP120 
Screen resolution1030k920kSharper screen (+110k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm XP120 and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 Fujifilm XP120 TG-820 iHS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP120 features outside measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") having a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm XP120 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XP120 versus the TG-820 iHS.

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP120 and TG-820 iHS is 91 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP120 and TG-820 iHS.

To sum up, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Fujifilm XP120 to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XP120 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XP120 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
42
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
27
comes with face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP120 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Street photography camera
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XP120 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Sports photography camera
46
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (210 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (220 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XP120 Travel photography info
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography info
67
environment sealing
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
not so great battery pack (210 shots)
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.9)
59
environment sealing
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse mode
terrible battery pack (220 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP120 Landscape photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography information
50
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
not so great battery pack (210 per charge)
38
pretty wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not possible
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
missing Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm XP120
Vlogging with Olympus TG-820 iHS
33
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have microphone support
33
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm XP120 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP120 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Fujifilm FinePix XP120Olympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix XP120 Olympus TG-820 iHS
Class Waterproof Waterproof
Announced 2017-01-05 2012-02-08
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VI
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 6400 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range 9cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 1,030 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 203 grams (0.45 pounds) 206 grams (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 shots 220 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $229 $500