Fujifilm XP120 vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm XP120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Launched January 2017
- Updated by Fujifilm XP130
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Fujifilm XP120 and Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP120 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XP120 was unveiled 2 years after the WG-M1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm XP120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm XP120 matches up versus the WG-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP120 and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP120 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP120 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm XP120 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2017 |  | September 2014 | Newer by 29 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+805k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm XP120
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm XP120 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP120 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm XP120 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP120 provides external dimensions of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XP120 and Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP120 against the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP120 and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP120 and WG-M1.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Fujifilm XP120 to produce more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP120 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XP120 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2017-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 9cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 203 grams (0.45 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $229 | $2,000 |