Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A900
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A900 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A900, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the A900 (20MP) is fairly close and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XP200 was brought out 3 years prior to the A900 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades versus the A900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Nikon Coolpix A900. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Nikon A900
| Fujifilm XP200 | A900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Fujifilm XP200
| A900 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | March 2013 | Newer by 35 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon A900
| Fujifilm XP200 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 comes with exterior dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Nikon A900 has sizing of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 vs the A900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and A900 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and A900.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon A900 to result in more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 lb) | 289g (0.64 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 300 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $250 | $400 |