Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus 6020
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Successor is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus 6020 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus 6020, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M5 III was revealed 9 years after the 6020 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M5 III grades versus the 6020 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus 6020
E-M5 III | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | February 2010 | Newer by 119 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-M5 III
6020 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus 6020
E-M5 III | 6020 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III offers outside dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has proportions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus 6020 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 III against the 6020.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and 6020 is 80 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and 6020.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will resolve more detail because of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 13MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 lb) | 122g (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,199 | $279 |