Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P7700
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
82 Imaging
37 Features
70 Overall
50
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P7700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Released May 2013
- Old Model is Nikon P7100
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P7700 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P7700, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and P7700 (12MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and P7700 (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm XP200 was revealed 2 months earlier than the P7700 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores vs the P7700 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P7700 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Nikon Coolpix P7700. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Nikon P7700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Nikon P7700
| Fujifilm XP200 | P7700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Fujifilm XP200
| P7700 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon P7700
| Fujifilm XP200 | P7700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 |  | May 2013 | Similar age |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P7700 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 provides physical dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Nikon P7700 has sizing of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") having a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P7700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 vs the P7700.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and P7700 is 90 and 82 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P7700 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading technical specs. The pic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and P7700.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XP200 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Fujifilm XP200 will deliver greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P7700 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2013-05-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 99 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.0-4.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 10.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 392 grams (0.86 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 53 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 191 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | EN-EL14 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $250 | $499 |