Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S6500

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Nikon S6500, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the S6500 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Fujifilm XP200 was launched 3 months after the S6500 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up versus the S6500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Nikon Coolpix S6500. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Nikon S6500 Gallery.

When you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 features physical dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Nikon S6500 has proportions of 95mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm XP200 versus Nikon S6500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the S6500.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and S6500 is 90 and 92 respectively.

Normally, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The picture here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and S6500.

All in all, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs though you might want to factor the age of the products into consideration.