Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S9900
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon S9900, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XP200 was manufactured 23 months prior to the S9900 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades versus the S9900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Nikon S9900
| Fujifilm XP200 | S9900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Fujifilm XP200
| S9900 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 | March 2013 | More modern by 23 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon S9900
| Fujifilm XP200 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 enjoys exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Nikon S9900 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon S9900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the S9900.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and S9900 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and S9900.
As you can see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photos however you may want to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 289 gr (0.64 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $250 | $300 |