Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon W300
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2017
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon W300 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon W300, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the W300 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XP200 was brought out 5 years earlier than the W300 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up versus the W300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon W300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Nikon Coolpix W300. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Nikon W300
| Fujifilm XP200 | W300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Fujifilm XP200
| W300 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | March 2013 | Fresher by 51 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon W300
| Fujifilm XP200 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 has outside dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Nikon W300 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon W300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the W300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and W300 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading through specifications. The visual below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and W300.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you can expect similar quality of photographs however you really should take the age of the products into consideration. The older Fujifilm XP200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon W300 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2017-05-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 231 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 280 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Built-in |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $250 | $387 |